AmCham arrow Publications arrow Topics Archive arrow Topics Archive 2006 arrow Vol.36- No.8 arrow Editorial: Conferences Don't Lead
Editorial: Conferences Don't Lead PDF Print E-mail

From its conception, the two-day Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development held at the end of July appeared set to be an exercise in futility. Decision-making by committee consensus usually means settling for the lowest common denominator, and in this case the "committee" was a cumbersome collection of delegates with sharply varying perspectives - business executives, labor leaders, government bureaucrats, political partisans, academics, and environmental and other advocates. The emotionally charged atmosphere of present-day Taiwan politics further ensured that the Conference's mandate to carve out agreement on economic policy would be monumentally difficult to achieve.

But if the conferees inevitably failed to see eye to eye on any items smacking of controversy (particularly those related to cross-Strait contacts), they still performed a worthy service by focusing public attention on the serious economic challenges Taiwan is facing. To AmCham it was significant that many of the 516 points of consensus that the Conference reached were similar to proposals that AmCham has long espoused, revealing how much the interests of the multinational business community converge with those of society at large in this international-trade-oriented economy. In some specific areas - further relaxing restrictions on the entry of foreign and mainland Chinese professionals, reforming the pharmaceutical reimbursement system, improving the transparency and rationality of the government procurement process, promoting service-sector development through deregulation, and adopting English as a semi-official language, for example - the recommendations echoed positions advanced in the Chamber's Taiwan White Paper.

 

Any sense of gratification over that confirmation of AmCham's stance was muted by two practical considerations, however. One is the realization that stating a list of general conclusions does not ensure effective implementation. What is needed now is for all the political and social groups that participated in the conference to provide active support to enable the government to move ahead quickly with the agreed-upon reforms.

The second dose of reality is that the conference - even given the limitations of its awkward structure - could have accomplished far more to assure a brighter economic future for Taiwan. Unfortunately politics got in the way when the tiny Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) held the meeting agenda hostage to the party's ideological bias against closer economic ties with China. As a pan-green ally, the TSU commands more influence with the government than the number of its supporters warrants, and the party's "spiritual leader," ex-President Lee Teng-hui, still has a following because of his past contributions to building Taiwan's democracy.

But on purely economic grounds, Lee and the TSU are off base. Without an ability to tap fully into the regional and global business activity that flows through China, Taiwan will be just another medium-sized market of limited interest to international corporations (and to their business-minded governments). By deferring to the TSU and failing to adopt further opening to China through expanded industrial investment and the opening of banking connections, the government is weakening, not safeguarding, Taiwan's competitiveness.