Publications
Topics Archive
Topics Archive 2006
Vol.36- No.8
Editorial: Conferences Don't Lead | Editorial: Conferences Don't Lead |
|
|
|
|
From its conception, the two-day Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development held at the end of July appeared set to be an exercise in futility. Decision-making by committee consensus usually means settling for the lowest common denominator, and in this case the "committee" was a cumbersome collection of delegates with sharply varying perspectives - business executives, labor leaders, government bureaucrats, political partisans, academics, and environmental and other advocates. The emotionally charged atmosphere of present-day Taiwan politics further ensured that the Conference's mandate to carve out agreement on economic policy would be monumentally difficult to achieve. Any sense of gratification over that confirmation of AmCham's stance was muted by two practical considerations, however. One is the realization that stating a list of general conclusions does not ensure effective implementation. What is needed now is for all the political and social groups that participated in the conference to provide active support to enable the government to move ahead quickly with the agreed-upon reforms. The second dose of reality is that the conference - even given the limitations of its awkward structure - could have accomplished far more to assure a brighter economic future for Taiwan. Unfortunately politics got in the way when the tiny Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) held the meeting agenda hostage to the party's ideological bias against closer economic ties with China. As a pan-green ally, the TSU commands more influence with the government than the number of its supporters warrants, and the party's "spiritual leader," ex-President Lee Teng-hui, still has a following because of his past contributions to building Taiwan's democracy. But on purely economic grounds, Lee and the TSU are off base. Without an ability to tap fully into the regional and global business activity that flows through China, Taiwan will be just another medium-sized market of limited interest to international corporations (and to their business-minded governments). By deferring to the TSU and failing to adopt further opening to China through expanded industrial investment and the opening of banking connections, the government is weakening, not safeguarding, Taiwan's competitiveness. |